Resilient water infrastructure partnerships in institutionally complex systems face challenging supply and financial risk tradeoffs
Caretta, M. A. et al. Water. In: Climate Change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 551–712 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2022).
Lall, U. et al. Water. In: Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: fourth national climate assessment (eds. Reidmiller, D. R. et al.) vol. II 145–173 (U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 2018).
He, C. et al. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nat. Commun. 12, 4667 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dolan, F. et al. Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world. Nat. Commun. 12, 1915–1915 (2021).
Google Scholar
American Society of Civil Engineers & Value of Water Campaign. The economic benefits of investing in water infrastructure. (2020).
Greer, R. A. A review of public water infrastructure financing in the United States. Rev. Water 7, 263–293 (2020).
Hanak, E. et al. California’s water: paying for water. 1–4 (2018).
Hansen, K. & Mullin, M. Barriers to water infrastructure investment: Findings from a survey of U.S. local elected officials. PLoS Water 1, e0000039–e0000039 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hughes, J. et al. Defining a resilient business model for water utilities. (2014).
Chapman, T. A. & Breeding, J. M. U. S. Public finance waterworks, sanitary sewer, and drainage utility systems: methodology and assumptions. 1–39 (2014).
Smull, E., Patterson, L. & Doyle, M. Rising market risk exposure of municipal water service providers in distressed cities. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 148, 05021032 (2022).
Patterson, L. A. & Doyle, M. W. Measuring water affordability and the financial capability of utilities. AWWA Water Sci. 3, e1260 (2021).
Rachunok, B. & Fletcher, S. Socio-hydrological drought impacts on urban water affordability. Nat. Water 1, 83–94 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cardoso, D. S. & Wichman, C. J. Water affordability in the United States. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2022WR032206 (2022).
Bell, E. V., Fencl, A. & Mullin, M. External drivers of participation in regional collaborative water planning. Policy Stud. J. (2022).
Hansen, K., Mullin, M. & Riggs, E. K. Collaboration risk and the choice to consolidate local government services. Perspect. Public Manag. Gov. 3, 223–238 (2020).
Gorelick, D. E., Zeff, H. B., Hughes, J., Eskaf, S. & Characklis, G. W. Exploring treatment and capacity-sharing agreements between water utilities. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 111, 26–40 (2019).
Google Scholar
Riggs, E. & Hughes, J. Crafting interlocal water and wastewater agreements. (2019).
Cypher, T. & Grinnell, C. Governments working together. A citizen’s guide to joint powers agreements. (2007).
Escriva-Bou, A., Sencan, G., Hanak, E. & Wilkinson, R. Water partnerships between cities and farms in Southern California and the San Joaquin Valley. (2020).
Newsom, G. et al. California water resilience portfolio – Governor’s Executive Order N-10-19. (2020).
Norriss, J., Cunningham, M., DeRosa, A. R. & Vedachalam, S. Too small to succeed: state‐level consolidation of water systems. J. AWWA 113, 8–15 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zeff, H. B. et al. California’s food-energy-water system: an open source simulation model of adaptive surface and groundwater management in the Central Valley. Environ. Model. Softw. 141, 105052–105052 (2021).
Google Scholar
Trindade, B. C., Gold, D. F., Reed, P. M., Zeff, H. B. & Characklis, G. W. Water pathways: an open source stochastic simulation system for integrated water supply portfolio management and infrastructure investment planning. Environ. Model. Softw. 132, 104772 (2020).
Escriva-Bou, A. et al. Water accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: comparative analysis. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 146, 04020004–04020004 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hanak, E. et al. Replenishing groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley. (2018).
Alam, S., Gebremichael, M., Li, R., Dozier, J. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Can managed aquifer recharge mitigate the groundwater overdraft in California’s central valley? Water Resour. Res. 56, e2020WR027244 (2020).
Dillon, P. et al. Sixty years of global progress in managed aquifer recharge. Hydrogeol. J. 27, 1–30 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kocis, T. N. & Dahlke, H. E. Availability of high-magnitude streamflow for groundwater banking in the Central Valley, California. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 084009–084009 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gold, D. F., Reed, P. M., Gorelick, D. E. & Characklis, G. W. Power and pathways: exploring robustness, cooperative stability, and power relationships in regional infrastructure investment and water supply management portfolio pathways. Earths Future 10, e2021EF002472 (2022).
Yoon, J. et al. A typology for characterizing human action in multisector dynamics models. Earths Future 10, e2021EF002641 (2022).
Srikrishnan, V. et al. Uncertainty analysis in multi‐sector systems: considerations for risk analysis, projection, and planning for complex systems. Earths Future 10, e2021EF002644 (2022).
Hamilton, A. L., Zeff, H. B., Characklis, G. W. & Reed, P. M. Resilient California water portfolios require infrastructure investment partnerships that are viable for all partners. Earths Future 10, e2021EF002573–e2021EF002573 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gorelick, D. E., Gold, D. F., Reed, P. M. & Characklis, G. W. Impact of inter‐utility agreements on cooperative regional water infrastructure investment and management pathways. Water Resour. Res. 58, 0043–1397 (2022).
Herman, J. D., Zeff, H. B., Reed, P. M. & Characklis, G. W. Beyond optimality: Multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 50, 7692–7713 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bird, R. M. & Slack, E. Financing infrastructure: who should pay? SSRN Electron. J. 110, 1–18 (2017).
Madani, K. Game theory and water resources. J. Hydrol. 381, 225–238 (2010).
De Souza, S., Medellín-Azuara, J., Lund, J. R. & Howitt, R. E. Beneficiary pays analysis of water recycling projects. (2011).
Giglio, R. J. & Wrightington, R. Methods for apportioning costs among participants in regional systems. Water Resour. Res. 8, 1133–1144 (1972).
Google Scholar
Watkins, A. R. Cost allocation in urban infrastructure funding. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 124, 44–53 (1998).
Google Scholar
Office of Governor Gavin Newsom. Governor newsom announces $5.1 billion package for water infrastructure and drought response as part of $100 Billion California Comeback Plan. (2021).
Hanak, E., Jezdimirovic, J., Escriva-Bou, A. & Ayres, A. A review of groundwater sustainability plans in the San Joaquin Valley (Public Comments Submitted to the California Department of Water Resources). 1–13 (2020).
Jezdimirovic, J., Hanak, E. & Escriva-Bou, A. What’s the plan to end groundwater overdraft in the San Joaquin Valley? (2020).
Hanak, E. et al. Water stress and a changing San Joaquin Valley. (2017).
Faunt, C. C. & Sneed, M. Water availability and subsidence in California’s Central Valley. San. Franc. Estuary Watershed Sci. 13, 0–8 (2015).
Levy, Z. F. et al. Critical aquifer overdraft accelerates degradation of groundwater quality in California’s Central Valley during drought. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1–10 (2021).
Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Faunt, C. C., Pool, D. & Uhlman, K. Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 035013–035013 (2016).
Google Scholar
Friant Water Authority. Subsidence: a critical challenge to Friant-Kern canal water deliveries. (2019).
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Friant-Kern Canal Middle Reach Capacity Correction Project. (2020).
Whisnand, C. Friant-Kern Canal repair process continues with repayment contract. The Porterville Recorder (2021).
Lehner, F. & Deser, C. Origin, importance, and predictive limits of internal climate variability. Environ. Res. Clim. 2, 023001 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gershunov, A., Shulgina, T., Ralph, F. M., Lavers, D. A. & Rutz, J. J. Assessing the climate-scale variability of atmospheric rivers affecting western North America. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 7900–7908 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. S., Zeff, H. B. & Herman, J. D. Adaptation of multiobjective reservoir operations to snowpack decline in the Western United States. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 146, 04020091–04020091 (2020).
Google Scholar
Brekke, L., Thrasher, B. L., Maurer, E. P. & Pruitt, T. Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections: release of downscaled cmip5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs. (2013).
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F. & Burges, S. J. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 99, 14415–14428 (1994).
Google Scholar
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).
Google Scholar
California State Treasurer’s Office. All issuance CY2019 on 12-22-20. (2020).
Hadka, D. & Reed, P. Borg: an auto-adaptive many-objective evolutionary computing framework. Evol. Comput. 21, 231–259 (2013).
Google Scholar
Coello Coello, C. A., Lamont, G. B. & Van Veldhuizen, D. A. Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. (Springer Science, Business Media, LLC, New York, NY, 2007).
Ghasemizade, M. et al. An integrated approach toward sustainability via groundwater banking in the Southern Central Valley, California. Water Resour. Res. 55, 2742–2759 (2019).
Google Scholar
University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. Kern county: irrigation management & agronomy. (2021).
Fernandez-Bou, A. S. et al. Underrepresented, understudied, underserved: gaps and opportunities for advancing justice in disadvantaged communities. Environ. Sci. Policy 122, 92–100 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hanak, E. et al. Water and the future of the San Joaquin valley. (2019).
California State Water Resources Control Board. Statutory water rights law and related California code sections. (2017).
Szeptycki, L. F., Forgie, J., Hook, E., Lorick, K. & Womble, P. Environmental water rights transfers: a review of state laws. (2015).
Womble, P. & Hanemann, W. M. Water Markets, Water Courts, and Transaction Costs in Colorado. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2019WR025507 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hagerty, N. Liquid constrained in California: estimating the potential gains from water markets. (2023).
Gonzalez, P. et al. Southwest. In: Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II (eds. Reidmiller, D. R. et al.) 1101–1184 (U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 2018).
AghaKouchak, A. et al. Anthropogenic drought: definition, challenges, and opportunities. Rev. Geophys. 59, e2019RG000683–e2019RG000683 (2021).
Google Scholar
Moallemi, E. A., Kwakkel, J., de Haan, F. J. & Bryan, B. A. Exploratory modeling for analyzing coupled human-natural systems under uncertainty. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102186–102186 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lempert, R. J. A new decision sciences for complex systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7309–7313 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kasprzyk, J. R., Nataraj, S., Reed, P. M. & Lempert, R. J. Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change. Environ. Model. Softw. 42, 55–71 (2013).
Google Scholar
Molina-Perez, E., Groves, D., Popper, S., Ramirez, A. & Crespo-Elizondo, R. Developing a robust water strategy for monterrey, Mexico: diversification and adaptation for coping with climate, economic, and technological uncertainties. (RAND Corporation, 2019).
Groves, D. et al. Developing robust strategies for climate change and other risks: a water utility framework. (Water Research Foundation, 2014).
Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E. & ter Maat, J. Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 485–498 (2013).
de Neufville, R., Smet, K., Cardin, M.-A. & Ranjbar-Bourani, M. Engineering options analysis (EOA): applications. In: Decision making under deep uncertainty 223–252, (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).
Gorelick, D. E. et al. Water supply infrastructure investments require adaptive financial assessment: evaluation of coupled financial and water supply dynamics. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 149, 04022084 (2023).
Herman, J. D., Quinn, J. D., Steinschneider, S., Giuliani, M. & Fletcher, S. Climate adaptation as a control problem: review and perspectives on dynamic water resources planning under uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 56, e24389–e24389 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fletcher, S. et al. Water supply infrastructure planning decision-making framework to classify multiple uncertainties and evaluate flexible design. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 143, 04017061–04017061 (2017).
Google Scholar
Basdekas, L. & Hayslett, R. Improving tradeoff understanding in water resource planning using multi-objective search. (2021).
Smith, R., Kasprzyk, J. & Dilling, L. Testing the potential of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) with Colorado water managers. Environ. Model. Softw. 117, 149–163 (2019).
Google Scholar
Smith, R. et al. Decision science can help address the challenges of long‐term planning in the Colorado River basin. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 58, 735–745 (2022).
Moallemi, E. A. et al. Evaluating participatory modeling methods for co-creating pathways to sustainability. Earths Future 9, e2020EF001843 (2021).
Dobbin, K. B. & Lubell, M. Collaborative governance and environmental justice: disadvantaged community representation in california sustainable groundwater management. Policy Stud. J. 49, 562–590 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fletcher, S. et al. Equity in water resources planning: a path forward for decision support modelers. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 148, 7 (2022).
Osman, K. K. & Faust, K. M. Toward operationalizing equity in water infrastructure services: developing a definition of water equity. ACS EST Water 1, 1849–1858 (2021).
Google Scholar
Avelino, F. Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation. J. Polit. Power 14, 425–448 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jafino, B. A., Kwakkel, J. H. & Taebi, B. Enabling assessment of distributive justice through models for climate change planning: a review of recent advances and a research agenda. Rev. Clim. Change 12, e721–e721 (2021).
McPhail, C. et al. Robustness metrics: how are they calculated, when should they be used and why do they give different results? Earths Future 6, 169–191 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ciullo, A., Kwakkel, J. H., De Bruijn, K. M., Doorn, N. & Klijn, F. Efficient or fair? Operationalizing ethical principles in flood risk management: a case study on the Dutch-German rhine. Risk Anal. 40, 1844–1862 (2020).
Google Scholar
Quinn, J. D., Reed, P. M., Giuliani, M. & Castelletti, A. Rival framings: a framework for discovering how problem formulation uncertainties shape risk management trade-offs in water resources systems. Water Resour. Res. 53, 7208–7233 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. L., Characklis, G. W. & Reed, P. M. From stream flows to cash flows: leveraging evolutionary multi‐objective direct policy search to manage hydrologic financial risks. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2021WR029747–e2021WR029726 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brand, M. W. et al. Environmental Impact Bonds: a common framework and looking ahead. Environ. Res. Infrastruct. Sustain. 1, 023001–023001 (2021).
Google Scholar
Larson, W. M., Freedman, P. L., Passinsky, V., Grubb, E. & Adriaens, P. Mitigating corporate water risk: financial market tools and supply management strategies. Water Altern. 5, 582–602 (2012).
Kern Water Bank Authority. Frequently Asked Questions. (2021).
Bracken, C., Rajagopalan, B. & Zagona, E. A hidden Markov model combined with climate indices for multidecadal streamflow simulation. Water Resour. Res. 50, 7836–7846 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hadjimichael, A. et al. Defining robustness, vulnerabilities, and consequential scenarios for diverse stakeholder interests in institutionally complex river basins. Earths Future 8, 1–22 (2020).
Google Scholar
Thyer, M. & Kuczera, G. A hidden Markov model for modelling long-term persistence in multi-site rainfall time series 1. Model calibration using a Bayesian approach. J. Hydrol. 275, 12–26 (2003).
Google Scholar
Brekke, L. D. et al. Assessing reservoir operations risk under climate change. Water Resour. Res. 45, 2008WR006941 (2009).
Google Scholar
Reed, P. M., Hadka, D., Herman, J. D., Kasprzyk, J. R. & Kollat, J. B. Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: the past, present, and future. Adv. Water Resour. 51, 438–456 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hadka, D. & Reed, P. Diagnostic assessment of search controls and failure modes in many-objective evolutionary optimization. Evol. Comput. 20, 423–452 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gupta, R. S., Hamilton, A. L., Reed, P. M. & Characklis, G. W. Can modern multi-objective evolutionary algorithms discover high-dimensional financial risk portfolio tradeoffs for snow-dominated water-energy systems? Adv. Water Resour. 145, 103718–103718 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zatarain Salazar, J., Reed, P. M., Herman, J. D., Giuliani, M. & Castelletti, A. A diagnostic assessment of evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective surface water reservoir control. Adv. Water Resour. 92, 172–185 (2016).
Google Scholar
Singh, L. A. et al. Low cost satellite constellations for nearly continuous global coverage. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–7 (2020).
Google Scholar
Woodruff, M. J., Reed, P. M. & Simpson, T. W. Many objective visual analytics: rethinking the design of complex engineered systems. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 48, 201–219 (2013).
Google Scholar
Giuliani, M., Quinn, J. D., Herman, J. D., Castelletti, A. & Reed, P. M. Scalable multiobjective control for large-scale water resources systems under uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 26, 1492–1499 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zatarain Salazar, J., Reed, P. M., Quinn, J. D., Giuliani, M. & Castelletti, A. Balancing exploration, uncertainty and computational demands in many objective reservoir optimization. Adv. Water Resour. 109, 196–210 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. L., Reed, P. M., Gupta, R. S., Zeff, H. B. & Characklis, G. W. Code and data for: resilient water infrastructure partnerships in institutionally complex systems face challenging supply and financial risk tradeoffs. Zenodo (2024).
link
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Asset-Coverage-Ratio-Final-bc6e411c0d1d4e329b52ffa0e4caf57d.jpg "Asset Coverage Ratio: Definition, Calculation, and Example")
